Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iberia Flight 6463


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  14:52, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Iberia Flight 6463

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable aviation incident. While the plane was written off, those caused by runway overruns are very common. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:28, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:28, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:28, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:28, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:28, 28 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence this passes WP:NEVENT; I can't find even fleeting news coverage. Gnomingstuff (talk) 14:39, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Other than sources confirming the existence of the accident, there's nothing out there indicating it was a news event of lasting significance. --Larry/Traveling_Man (talk) 17:18, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Runway excursions are quite common. The fact that a decision was made not to repair the plane does not make this a notable event. Gentleman wiki (talk) 17:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ecuador-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:43, 28 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment, this does have coverage just not under the flight number (IB6463). El Mundo in 2007:, FG: . Various aviation sites from much later: . The aircraft involved, a large Airbus A340-600, was new one (first flight 2006, crash end of 2007) and was destroyed (the airline decided to break it up rather than recover and repair it). Uncertain about NEVENT here, but coverage is more forthcoming when searching for A340+Quito+Iberia.-- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 14:55, 29 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep It seems that it is notable, just that it needs desparate expansion through it. It has a decent amount of coverage as seen above. KlientNo.1 (talk) 16:26, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability is not temporary .--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 11:56, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * - are you sure you meant delete with that rationale? Mjroots (talk) 18:37, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Thanks por pointing this out. I don't know what I was thinking about. On a second thought, the airframe was written off so a keep is more appropriate for me.--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 19:07, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete doesnt appear to be particularly noteworthy for a stand-alone article, a mention under A340 and and Iberia as a write off should be sufficient. MilborneOne (talk) 07:52, 1 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.