Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ibid Gallery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:09, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Ibid Gallery

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Apparently fails WP:CORP. Apart from its routine business of buying and selling artworks, the only thing it has ever done to attract news coverage seems to be the closure of its London space. I've not found any in-depth coverage that indicates why it should be considered important enough to have an article here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:14, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 19:54, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 04:30, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 04:30, 20 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete: I added a couple of article references which provide basic verification of this gallery's operations in London and Los Angeles, but either these nor art fair listings and occasional reviews found through searches provide enough for WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 08:41, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete I checked for myself and what is said above is exactly right.104.163.148.25 (talk) 02:30, 26 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.