Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ibrahim Electric


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. WP:NPASR Mark Arsten (talk) 00:32, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Ibrahim Electric

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

unref blp; tagged for notability for 5 years Boleyn (talk) 11:23, 16 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. This does not appear to be a BLP, but the article for a Danish Band. However, there are also no references and little evidence of notability, so it still merits a delete. Now, find me sources and I'd be happy to keep - I see a quote from someone in the band in an article from Dec 2012 (in Danish) here, so perhaps there's more to it. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 19:00, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak keep There's some evidence of notability with reviews in AllMusic, JazzTimes, and All About Jazz (which seems largely to use professional journalists based on the writer bios). "Ibrahim Electric Meets Ray Anderson" is most notable. Other album reviews. I'm not sure about the reliability of these. And other less WP:RS sources (some Danish government). Most of the Danish-language coverage seems to be ticket sales or listings, though some may still have useful info. --Colapeninsula (talk) 12:17, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 14:21, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 14:21, 17 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 02:27, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Automatic Strikeout  ( T  •  C ) 00:17, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 10:48, 6 February 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.