Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ibrahim bin Ismail


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:12, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Ibrahim bin Ismail

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non notable religious figure lack of WP:SIGCOV and fails WP:GNG. His importance appears to be largely restricted to Bengkalis Regency, with minimal recognition beyond this local area, let alone nationwide in Indonesia. While he may have some standing within the local Muslim scholar community, his broader significance is dubious. It's worth noting that the only source cited in the article, focuses on the 21 ulamas in Bengkalis regency rather than specifically highlighting him. Ckfasdf (talk) 04:07, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Islam and Indonesia.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  04:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:28, 30 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete not much to say here but that I agree with your assessment.
 * Allan Nonymous (talk) 12:06, 31 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.