Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Icarly season 6


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete per WP:G4 by  (non-admin closure) --Breawycker (talk to me!)  21:58, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Icarly season 6

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unsourced speculation about a future TV broadcast. The lack of sources mean it is not verifiable by readers and violates the rules that Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Previously subject to a proposed deletion, but that was removed without comment by the orignal author, so bringing here for comment. Sparthorse (talk) 15:56, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. Author blanked the page before all this so should be speedy per db-author - so tagged. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:21, 13 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Unsourced crystal ball gazing. (Looking at the history, the author did blank it but straight away recreated it as originally, and I don't think that can really be seen as a valid G7 request to delete - so I have declined the speedy deletion request) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:53, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unsourced WP:CRYSTAL. Article was blanked by the author and then validly tagged for CSD A3. Author should not have removed the speedy tag. --AussieLegend (talk) 19:17, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I originally tagged it per Proposed Deletion then the author blanked the page.--Breawycker (talk to me!) 19:54, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per all the comments at previous discussion at Articles for deletion/ICarly (season 6) Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:33, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. As it has already been deleted by AfD last month and the latest one is not better, it's eligible for CSD:G4, so I've tagged it as such -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:39, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.