Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IceTV Good


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete both. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:20, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

IceTV Good

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No reliable sources found at all. Soundtrack to a red link show. The notable songs on this album don't make the album inherently notable. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 15:43, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced unreliable article with questionable notability Arma virumque cano (talk) 16:09, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * This user has since been blocked as a sockpuppet. - ALLST✰R ▼ echo wuz here @ 19:34, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This user's primarily contributions to Wikipedia have been to !vote (primarily delete) on dozens of AfDs approximately 1 minute apart from each other. See AN thread --ThaddeusB (talk) 19:07, 23 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I've added Ice TV (soundtrack) to this AFD since it's closely related, being the soundtrack of the previous year for the same show. Delete both as non-notable. This would not prevent an article being written on the television program IceTV itself.- gadfium 03:23, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. - gadfium  03:25, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete, both fail to establish notability per WP:MUSIC. Question: in your opinion, could these have been Speedied A9? I had a similar case recently which was denied with the excuse that there were some notable acts on the album.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 01:45, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I think speedying under A9 would have been possible, but since they are compilation albums it is a bit of a stretch to equate the TV show with the artist. I rarely do speedy deletions, and I don't believe I've ever used that criteria, so I don't know what usual practice is for such albums.- gadfium 02:18, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I figured they didn't fall under A9 as almost all of the artists appear notable. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 14:59, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * What about the oldie but a goodie WP:NOTINHERITED???   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 03:06, 25 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.