Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ice Age (band) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 01:02, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Ice Age (band)

 * — (View AfD)

The decision of a prior AfD was overturned at deletion review and is now back for more deliberation. Procedural listing, so I have no opinion. ~ trialsanderrors 07:56, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - notable and per everyone on the deletion review. Bubba hotep 14:51, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - I should say, "per everyone who voted overturn on the deletion review. Bubba hotep 14:55, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as before. Meets WP:MUSIC. --badlydrawnjeff talk 11:59, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep for the same reason as in the last Afd; two full-length albums on a notable label. Prolog 14:34, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as the act appears to go the way of Brian Setzer and The Stray Cats, being a US act being much more notable in Europe than in the US (at least in the beginning). The article is in dire need of a rewrite and redlink removal, though. B.Wind 18:40, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as per previous AFD, for which a good-faith closure would have been "keep". — CharlotteWebb 21:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * That is unfair: if you had read the DRV discussion you would have noticed that at the point when the original AFD was closed, the evidence did indeed point in the wrong direction. Please check your facts before flinging accusations. TIA HAND —Phil | Talk 12:09, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as per discussion at DRV and new evidence. HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 12:09, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per B.Wind.--John Lake 19:05, 14 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.