Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ice Age 3: A New Beginning


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete until further explicit details of the movie are released. Sr13 03:26, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Ice Age 3: A New Beginning

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Crystal ball, only two ghits to this, neither of them reliable (they're "blacklisted" sites, can't list them here). Would suggest "salting" this and "Ice Age 3" until there is a formal announcement regarding the sequel. SkierRMH 03:30, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL- G  1  ggy  Talk/Contribs 04:46, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, there are several ghits for "Ice Age 3", and one of the movie principles has confirmed that production is greenlit. The working title, however, appears to be "Ice Age: A New Beginning", so I'm going to boldly move this page to the correct title. Groupthink 04:49, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * After further review, I've decided that my initial impression was incorrect and everyone else here is right: this article is an amalgam of speculation, unverifiable rumors and prophesy.  I'm changing my recommendation to Delete. Groupthink 06:58, 15 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - The first page of Google hits (taking out IMDB, Wikipedia and Answers.com) are all forum posts of speculation. No WP:RS, just a lot of crystal balling. -- Kesh 06:01, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and clean up. It's offical. 20th Century Fox announces there will be another Ice Age sequel.--Edtropolis 15:52, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * All that's been announced is that it was approved to be filmed. There's no release date, no actors hired. There isn't even a screenplay yet. This is article couldn't be anything more than "Fox has green-lit a sequel." That wouldn't even be a stub. -- Kesh 16:49, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete-I edited this article for spelling and grammer, and tagged it for sources, and none are coming, or likely to come. An article can be created if/when the film is released.--Rossheth | Talk to me 18:41, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, it's too early for this article. Being approved does not necessarily mean it is confirmed for production. Maybe wait a couple of months.--Kylohk 14:33, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL, much too premature at this point in time. -- Kyok o  22:42, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL, and lack of reliable sources to get the article beyond even a sub-stub&mdash; arf! 07:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.