Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ice Blazer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List of Zoids.  MBisanz  talk 02:04, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Ice Blazer

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This fictional weapon does not establish notability independent of Zoids through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research, trivial model details, and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, and this is too trivial to require any separate coverage. TTN (talk) 23:23, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not establish notability through significant coverage of real world context in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. Jay32183 (talk) 05:26, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect. Establishing notability independent of Zoids is only neccesary for independent article, merging only requires verification it exists. (see WP:FICT) - Mgm|(talk) 11:31, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to List of Zoids as per Mgm. Edward321 (talk) 14:44, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom as nn. Eusebeus (talk) 23:48, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. No need to have an article for every Zoid. All important information is already in List of Zoids so there is nothing really to merge. A google search for ""Ice Blazer" -wiki" gives nothing relevant to Zoids. They are hundreds of Zoids, no redirects for every single of them is needed. -- Magioladitis (talk) 01:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.