Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ice Mountain (water)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Protonk (talk) 00:12, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Ice Mountain (water)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not enough notability per WP:CORP. There is some news coverage, for example here, but this a one-time event and the focus of the article is actually Nestle. Tan  &#124;   39  19:23, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep — Sources found being vilified along with the evil Republicans and you-know-who, being torched by ELF. MuZemike  ( talk ) 23:10, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Factual, sourced, and as notable as all the other entries in the "Bottled water brands" category.  --Lockley (talk) 14:21, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Sourced? All the article has at the time writing this is just an external link. Bidgee (talk) 07:20, 2 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete The article is brief, doesn't have any reliable sources, doesn't state it's notability. The first of the above links found by MuZemike is really about the owner of Ice Mountain (Nestlé) and the second is just a very small sentence about a fire about one of it's pumping stations. Maybe the brand itself is better off in the Nestlé article. Bidgee (talk) 07:20, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep /Merge per reasoning  Nestle regionalizes their brands of waters within the United States (Ozarka is confined to the Southwest for instance, while Arrowhead Water is sold in the West and Poland Spring is exclusive to the Northeast, etc.), and this brand is Nestle's Midwest brand. Perhaps a new article under a title of Nestle Waters North America with all of the brands and their territories combined into one article may be justified.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 08:14, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Further comment Great job on the extended edits.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 05:33, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep I have added 4 links (some to back up what has been said and some to add new information. Actually this issue has has been more than one event for this company. They have been trying to setup new sources for water all over Michigan and they have not been welcomed anywhere they have gone so far. Googling Ice Mountain controversy has brought back a ton of links.  spryde |  talk  14:49, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:38, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.