Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ice Warriors Hockey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:30, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Ice Warriors Hockey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This organization does not seem to meet our guidelines for notability in general or for sports-releated subjects. In my efforts to take WP:BEFORE into consideration, there were no matches found when searching for non-passing coverage from reliable third party sources. The links currently provided within the article are primary sources or are otherwise irrelevant. Suggesting page removal until the burden for notability (and WP:V) are met. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 00:40, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 01:29, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 01:29, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 01:29, 19 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. A D level rec league team? Fails notability criteria easily, but more pertinent, fails as Wikipedia is not a free web host Resolute 01:34, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. I think you're being too generous taking this to AfD. It's a clear candidate for speedy deletion in my view. It falls under WP:A7, "An article about a real person, individual animal(s), organization, web content or organized event that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant". I don't see any claim of notability here whatsoever. T.C.Haliburtontalk nerdy to me 02:12, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * 20-Mule Team Delete: On the contrary, there are a number of assertions of notability. It still doesn't mean that the article is anything but a steaming heap of non-notability.   Ravenswing   04:14, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. -DJSasso (talk) 17:12, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.