Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ice helmet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete as Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. (aeropagitica) 17:38, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Ice helmet
I submitted this to proposed deletion, on the grounds that the article cited no sources, and there is no indication that the single movie prop mentioned was even called an ice helmet. The linked-to article doesn't even contain the word "helmet", and doesn't support this article at all. At the time, I also added a request for sources. The author,, who has recently given us earwig helmet, , and (deleted--Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 19:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC)) , removed both the prod and the request for sources without comment. It appears that not even the article's author has any sources that back this up. Uncle G 18:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:NOT an indiscriminate collection of information. Moreschi 19:24, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. joke. `'mikkanarxi 19:57, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I think this is pretty obvious. A prop worn in one scene from one movie is hardly notable.  Article is one in a slew of joke/tantrum "helmet" submissions made one day.  Wavy G 22:03, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. this is a joke. TSO1D 22:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Close WP:SNOW. Just H 23:16, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Did anyone else catch the irony in that? Wavy G 03:48, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * haha, funny.~user:orngjce223how am I typing? 21:00, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not expandable nor notable enough to be an article of its own. --Czj 09:07, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Danny Lilithborne 13:05, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with Cheese Helmet. --DodgerOfZion 07:08, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.