Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iceage sugar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:10, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Iceage sugar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Don't believe that they meet WP:NBAND - have yet to release an album. Currently playing the pub/club circuit - non notable IMO Gbawden (talk) 10:36, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Well, to start with the article is at the wrong capitalisation. Should be Iceage Sugar. Other than that, couldn't find anyway so I support delete. JTdale   Talk 10:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. not notable; maybe someday. Kierzek (talk) 14:28, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:00, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 10 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete, not notable, fails WP:NBAND. -- Amaryllis Gardener  talk 16:04, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. A few blog mentions/reviews and gig listings aside, I couldn't find anything that would demonstrate any kind of notability. Maybe one day they'll meet the notability threshold for bands, but they ain't there yet. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 01:38, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.