Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Icebird


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete - I can count you know, I don't need a running commentary. --Cel e stianpower háblame 16:08, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Icebird
Doesn't meet criteria of WP:MUSIC that I can tell Nv8200p talk 22:53, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Actually, the article 'does' seem just a bit useless. It's probably just some people posting their own group on wikipedia for the purposes of self-promotion...in a rather useless manner. Well, I found the article using good ol' random article. So, yea. User_talk:Volcanictelephone 12:03, 16 December 2005 (EST) Debate relisted for lacking votes. And AFD IS NOT A VOTE!!!1shift+one1!. Johnleemk | Talk 15:55, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - 1 album is not enough. By the way, above vote was also for delete, so we have 2 deletes now. Zordrac  (talk) Wishy Washy  Darwikinian Eventualist 06:28, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * AfD IS NOT A VOTE! fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 16:09, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominate. That's 3 votes.  Madman 16:04, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * LOL. Some people just get silly with thsi stuff.  2 people said "delete", which is their vote, whether its counted or not lol. Zordrac  (talk) Wishy Washy  Darwikinian Eventualist 16:48, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I find notes pointing out the "number" of "votes" to closing admins exceedingly obnoxious, and I'm sure I'm not the only closing admin who feels that way. Just referring to comments as "votes" in itself isn't a problem. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 03:50, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I vote delete. Let us not forget that the entire process was originally called Votes for Deletion.  The name changed was to clarify that this process was for articles, not to suggest it was not a voting process. Proto t c 11:03, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * A "vote" backed up by an excellent argument is better than two or three "delete nn ~ " or "keep ~ " "votes". All the time we talk about votes and tallies and suchlike, we get confused people saying "that vote tally equalled exactly 66% delete!  Why wasn't it deleted?" or whatever.  And that's Bad. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 13:16, 21 December 2005 (UTC)


 * I'll simply say that I urge to delete as the act fails WP:MUSIC with their 2005 album released on an obscure indy label... and leave the squabbling about the AfD process to the people who are getting worked up about it. B.Wind 17:49, 21 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.