Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iced cappuccino


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was merge and redirect to Cappuccino.  howch e  ng   {chat} 17:32, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Iced cappuccino
Could possibly be an article, or recipe, but not in it's current form.--MONGO 04:28, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as nonsense. (We're reading a comparison of "gourmet" coffees from Horny Tim's vs other doughnut stores?!?) Jamie (talk/contribs) 05:30, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete This is nonsense. If someone wants to make a content filled article on the subject they can recreate it.  xaosflux  Talk  / CVU  07:45, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment - "content-filled" sounds like a new flavour of dougnut from the establishment mentioned in the article. I wonder if it's regular priced or premium.  :)  Jamie (talk/contribs) 08:41, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, POV review and advert. Not encyclopedic at the moment. - Mgm|(talk) 10:41, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * comment I tried cleaning it up a little, though I ran out of things to say -- Astrokey44 |talk 15:43, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge to the Cappuccino article to discourage recreation. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 16:22, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge to Cappuccino-- EXCEPT for the Karla Homolka bit, which can be merged to her article. Really, Canada-- my God... ALC Washington 17:45, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup. Valid drink. -- JJay 19:40, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm tending toward Keep...on the other hand "Iced Tea" redirects to "Tea" (which fails to make any mention of Iced Tea whatsoever....) Jcuk 19:50, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Then we obviously need an article on iced tea pronto. -- JJay 19:52, 23 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect per CSCWEM. Stifle 13:25, 26 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.