Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iceland–South Korea relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:18, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Iceland–South Korea relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

another random country combination, the extent of relations seems very limited: http://www.mofat.go.kr/english/regions/europe/20070818/1_990.jsp? doesn't appear to be any bilateral or trade agreements? LibStar (talk) 04:33, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Two countries on opposite sides of the world, neither of which have full embassies in the other country. Sure, real notable. -- BlueSquadron Raven  05:11, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as yet another random bilateral pairing with no notability demonstrated. - Biruitorul Talk 05:11, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. A Google search of 'Iceland Korea' doesn't produce any reliable sources suitable for establishing notability or expanding the article: Nick-D (talk) 08:33, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - No embassies, very little trade, hardly any investments and no presidential/royal/whatever visits to the other country. Yeah, real notable. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) | (talk to me) | (What I've done)  09:24, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, conventions to improve economic cooperation and a visit by a foreign minister, yeah, real notable. MyDog22 (talk) 09:32, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions.  —PC78 (talk) 15:28, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Sources provided by MyDog22 (indef. blocked vandalism account) indicate this topic is notable. ChildofMidnight (talk) 16:43, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:N. No inherent notability for the fact that two random countries do or do not exchange ambassadors. Wikipedia is WP:NOT a directory or a collection of miscellaneous information. Edison (talk) 16:59, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. They don't even have proper embassies; no content; useless/redundant/superfluous. Rd232 talk 22:24, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.