Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ichak Adizes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 00:19, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Ichak Adizes

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Where to begin? This article is a mess. Its been noted as such on the talk page, and that was months ago. I see no action being made on the page, and its a biography page, so that means that there are some special provisions for the article. Since its a mess, and according to the deletion log its been axed before on blatant advertising grounds, and because I have copyright concerns for the article, I'm listing it here for deletion. TomStar81 (Talk) 03:39, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 18:03, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 18:03, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 18:04, 19 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Willing to reconsider if the article is drastically trimmed and overhauled. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 05:05, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 19:26, 26 November 2014 (UTC)




 * Hmm... Subject definitely meets the notability requirements for authors/academics (and probably also business people), but the article is promotional and a close paraphrase of http://www.ichakadizes.com/. I would suggest it should be deleted as a copyright violation with no prejudice against recreation as a proper article.  (There is nothing salvageable, otherwise I'd say stubbify.) --ThaddeusB (talk) 02:42, 3 December 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.