Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iconic Digital


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:56, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Iconic Digital

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It's a web SEO company. Guess what, no sources here that aren't self-generated. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:02, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. I hesitated over the sources but I don't see any independent evidence of notability. Deb (talk) 11:09, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: An article sourced to the firm's own site and press releases, some of which don't back up the claims they are placed to support. Fastest-growing listings and local awards do not amount to evidence of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 18:09, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.