Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Icrime


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete --Haemo 01:12, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Icrime

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Dictionary definition of a non-existent word. The term does appear to be very occasionally used (albeit I can only find one use that isn't on either a blog or a forum post), but I really don't think this one's even worth transwikiing as I think it's unlikely Urban Dictionary would want this, let alone Wiktionary. A mess of unsourced claims, US-centricism, apparent original research and weasel words; our old friends "some people" and "others claim" both raise their heads. —  iride  scent  03:19, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, NN protologism. Fails WP:NEO, WP:V, WP:RS. --Dhartung | Talk 05:00, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral, does appear to have been given some coverage, although may still fail WP:NEO and WP:RS.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 13:54, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Deleteper Dhartung. Fails a whole array of policies. Doctorfluffy 23:16, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Note - user indefinitely blocked as disruptive sockpuppet. — xDanielx T/C 22:26, 9 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.