Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ida Kidder


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) SD0001 (talk) 13:29, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Ida Kidder

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet notability guidelines Melcous (talk) 04:41, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - Google Books is full of librarian newsletters mentioning Ms. Kidder, which are not in her article at present. There is also this: Women Academic Librarians on the Western Frontier, 1900-1920 Joanne E. Passet The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy Vol. 60, No. 4 (Oct., 1990), pp. 320-336.  This is the sort of unique Wikipedia article that we should endeavor to keep around, if possible. Caro7200 (talk) 13:41, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep as meets WP:GNG. There is enough sourcing, both in the article and out of it, for a woman of her time. There is little enough coverage of women librarians of this era; it would be a shame to see this one deleted. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 00:14, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Significant sourcing, albeit very localized. Recently created article so must assume that further research may result in broader range of sources. Lamona (talk) 06:22, 13 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.