Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IdeaPad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Shawn Teller (talk) 03:18, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

IdeaPad

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Where do i even start. The ENTIRE page is either an advert, unsourced, and poorly written mess. I'm actually surprised no one AfDed this before. 2603:6080:7C40:5E0:40F8:BD5C:5B36:5B3 (talk) 02:16, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2023 February 25.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 02:27, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment I accepted the AfD out of AfC but am otherwise neutral on the nomination. Star   Mississippi  02:30, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Products,  and Computing. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (work / talk) 04:41, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article could use improvement, but it doesn't read like an advertisement to me, and it cites 36 sources, most of which seem to be independent from the subject. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 15:19, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep The article has WP:POTENTIAL. It has some issues but the subject is notable and I believe it could be improved by other editors. Material Works  (talk) 15:22, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Yeah, we're not deleting Lenovo's i Pad competitor mid-tier computer line (corrected  Nate  • ( chatter ) 17:55, 27 February 2023 (UTC)).  Nate  • ( chatter ) 02:05, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
 * note: the ideapad 1i cant be turned into a tablet and you need a reason to keep the article, not just "Yeah, we're not deleting Lenovo's iPad competitor" 75.184.28.178 (talk) 11:08, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I had the wrong product line, but point still stands; this isn't going anywhere and at worst will be redirected.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 17:55, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Still, thats not a vaild reason to keep a article. you need a reason 2603:6080:7C40:5E0:4D1E:928B:22C8:76F8 (talk) 12:49, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment Don't really need one for a nom with a poor rationale. WP:GNG is more than met for one, so I guess there's your reason.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 01:43, 2 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.