Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ideal Life Settlements


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete early close as this is SEO spam, which is vandalism and contra to policy. Just zis Guy you know? 11:56, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Ideal Life Settlements
Is there an echo in here? User:HayMeadows says that Puget Custom Computers is ''a United States computer hardware company; with a reputation for offering a high level of customer satisfaction for buyer's of desktops, laptops, video editing, and gaming computers. The company is based in Kent, Washington, and was founded in 2000 by its current owner and president, Jon Bach. Whereas Ideal Life Settlements is a United States Life Settlement company; with a reputation for offering a high level of customer satisfaction for those interested in selling their Life Insurance policy. The company is based in Wall, New Jersey, and was founded in 1996 by its current owner and president, Robert Taurosa.''

For Puget we are told that Over the years, Puget Custom Computers has maintained excellent customer support ratings at places such as resellerratings.com. while in the case of Ideal, Over the years, Ideal Life Settlements has maintained excellent customer support ratings including being a member of the BBB since 2003, LISA Member, and NAIFA Member. Kill as spam. Just zis Guy you know? 22:16, 5 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. At least it's not "policy's". Tevildo 22:20, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete First 50 google hits appear to be primarily directory entries. Didn't see a reliable source among them.  106 unique hits among 300 total isn't convincing evidence either.  Note http://www.haymeadows.com is involved in SEO optimization and specifically references this company as a SEO client.  Probable Spam, fails WP:CORP.  GRBerry 03:48, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom and does not meet WP:CORP; basically an advertisement. &mdash; ERcheck (talk) 04:03, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. SPAM, and in a rusty tin, too. Crikey! You've got to admire the balls of people like user:HayMeadows. --die Baumfabrik 04:28, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Nah, I have to shake my head at the ineptitude. --Calton | Talk 05:14, 6 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not just SEO spam, but ridiculously obvious SEO spam, as a comparison of the contributions of the article creator and this website would show. --Calton | Talk 05:14, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.