Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ideal PR


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core des at 04:19, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Ideal PR

 * Delete: WP:VSCA. No reliable sources given for verification. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Clearly fails WP:CORP, and does not even try to assert notability.  --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:56, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:CORP Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 12:14, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Working for notable people does not make a company notable by association. Fan-1967 14:10, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete —  should have been marked . delete.  JoeSmack Talk (p-review!) 05:46, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * db-spam implies that the article is so extensively POV and spammy that it would need a complete rewrite. That's not the case here.  It would need expansion to demonstrate notability but the content already there would be suitable.  —Wknight94 (talk) 11:04, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.