Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ideal User


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. --Ezeu 00:42, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Ideal User
Frankly, I'm not sure this should be deleted, but at least it should be moved to back-end pages (or whatever that's called) as an essay or something. I don't think we ought to have an "ideal user" or even this page when we already have loads of guides about how "anyone" can edit wikipedia. On the other hand, I don't want to give anyone a reason to claim we are censoring suggestions, even silly ones. Chaser (T) 20:48, 24 May 2006 (UTC) Edit: Strong delete as bad faith per Fbv65edel. --Chaser (T) 22:12, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong and Speedy Delete. The user who created the page, User:Jimster_260 (talk • contribs), lists User:Bachrach44 as being an "ideal user," yet Jimster has vandalized his/her userpage. Jimster also "predicts" the deletion of his article (in a day and an hour) on the talk page, and "feels this article may be deleted," as noted on the main section of the article. --Fbv65 e del (discuss 21:20, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge the main list to some Wikipedia: namespace page. Remove the section about "examples of such users" as that could lead to some trouble later on Delete as a bad-faith, out-of-namespace page per Fbv65edel...Scott5114 21:58, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Good idea, but the article appears to be unencyclopedic and the result of original research.  Article may be more appropriate on the user's page or website.  --Starionwolf 04:27, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I think that this page was meant to be something in the Wikipedia namespace, but they were to new to understand that. Therefore, I vote to Move to Wikipedia:Ideal user, than tag it with Proposed.
 * Delete and put it out of its misery. Tyrenius 23:57, 30 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.