Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ideate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 14:33, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Ideate
Nominated for AfD by an anon, who was unable/did not complete the deletion discussion page, but completed steps 1 and 3 of the nomination. Looking at the article, I've looked at the article, and am completing the nomination, based on the fact that Wikipedia is not a dictionary. There is already an entry at Wiktionary for this term, although here and there disagree on the definition. -- Saberwyn 07:37, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as dictdef. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Feezo (Talk) 10:01, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, textbook dicdef.--Isotope23 14:42, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's not even a real word. Brian G. Crawford 14:47, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, obviously. Vizjim 15:27, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 05:04, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete appears to be a made up word. No documentation to the contrary. : ( Lonesomedovechocolate 03:57, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- Argon233 T  @ C  &para; U &ang; 06:29, 6 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.