Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ideology in literature


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:07, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Ideology in literature

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Extremely poorly sourced (WP:PRIMARY) mish-mash of WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. WP:TNT candidate if ever I saw one. Kleuske (talk) 13:23, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 14:25, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 14:25, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 14:25, 4 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete not because the subject isn't notable but because this is so bad it can't be fixed unless someone can blank it and write a stub. I've warned this editor before as have others about such problems. Doug Weller  talk 16:13, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: The article has many technical flaws (I've tried to rectify a few in the early part) and stylistic shortcomings that make it hard to grasp the author's ideas.  That's a shame, because there might be something useful here, if it could be properly organized and presented.  The author might consider getting assistance in putting together an article on the subject, publishing it in the traditional print media, then bringing the topic back to Wikipedia.  Nihil novi (talk) 22:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. This page reads like a personal essay, and the subject is poorly defined. This page might be renamed to something like Politics and literature or Political ideologies in fiction, but one should use good secondary RS, specifically on this very general subject, rather than a list of arbitrary examples. Which secondary RS on such general subject exist? I can see only a couple. My very best wishes (talk) 20:54, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - This is an original essay, many of the subcomponents of which are WP:NOTABLE topics for articles — but the overall essay attempts to cobble together too many disparate things into a common theme. Carrite (talk) 16:19, 10 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.