Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ietsism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:21, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Ietsism

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable neologism. I've searched and failed to find any significant coverage of this term in independent reliable sources (even Dutch ones). I've also checked the corresponding articles on foreign-language Wikipedias; nothing there either. (The best was a one-word mention in this article .) On the talk page a merge has been suggested; but with a complete lack of sources and no evidence that this is a notable term, I think the article should simply be deleted as original research. Robofish (talk) 21:45, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 10:34, 26 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions.  — --Lambiam 15:32, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  — --Lambiam 15:32, 26 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. In less than one minute of searching I found three references to news sources:, one to a definition taken from an encyclopedia: , and one to an apparently serious book with the term in the title: . They are in Dutch, but all appear to be reliable sources to me. --Lambiam 15:26, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, apparently I'm just rubbish at searching for sources. Thanks for finding them, and consider this AFD withdrawn. Robofish (talk) 22:46, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.