Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/If You Could See Me Now (Oscar Peterson album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by user: WP:SNOW (non-admin closure) &#91;Username Needed&#93; 10:43, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

If You Could See Me Now (Oscar Peterson album)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

What makes this notable? &#91;Username Needed&#93; 11:09, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:04, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:04, 14 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Winning the 1987 Juno Award for Best Jazz Album, and receiving reviews from Allmusic, The Washington Post, and Digital Audio, and having further coverage in books such as The Rough Guide to Jazz, The Penguin Guide to Jazz on CD, LP and Cassette, and The Rolling Stone Jazz Record Guide is a good start, I would say. --Michig (talk) 12:07, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per Michig. Philafrenzy (talk) 12:40, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep: winning the Juno award would almost be enough by itself. It's always going to be hard to find information online about albums that precede the internet age, but given what a legendary figure Peterson was in the world of jazz, it would be astounding if there weren't several reviews of this record in print versions of jazz-based magazines at the time, such as DownBeat. Richard3120 (talk) 12:51, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep: I really don't like permastubs but I think this can be fleshed out considering the reviews. Either way it's notable because of the Juno (see WP:NALBUM criterion 4).    SITH   (talk)   14:11, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep: The sources and award identified above by above are sufficient to demonstrate that WP:NALBUM criteria 1 and 4 are met. AllyD (talk) 16:30, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep As creator, it worries me that such a discussion could be started by an experienced editor with such a cursory explanation. I created the article a long time ago, but a simple search would have proved its notability. No Swan So Fine (talk) 20:17, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - per every one above. When you have questions like this, it’s best to follow through with WP:BEFORE rather than bother the community with a spurious deletion discussion. Sergecross73   msg me  02:11, 15 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.