Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ifeanyi KOH


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:20, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Ifeanyi KOH

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual. No coverage in WP:RS; sole coverage is from blogs, twitter, facebook, etc. Fails WP:ANYBIO generally, and WP:NACADEMIC specifically. &mdash; O Fortuna!   Imperatrix mundi.  12:56, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable individual lacking reliable source coverage.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:41, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 3 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. No evidence of notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:14, 3 April 2017 (UTC).
 * Delete fails WP:ANYBIO ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 06:26, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as notability is not evident. The body, Koh heads, NAFSTS, doesn't seem to be notable either.  — Stringy Acid (talk) 17:21, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No evidence of notability. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 20:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.