Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ifisboia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Obvious. WP:SNOW. &mdash; Scientizzle 23:17, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Ifisboia

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not for things made up one day - need I say more? SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:14, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 *  Speedy Delete I nominated this article for Speedy Deletion Delete as not notable at all  C t j f 8 3 Talk 03:21, August 20, 2008
 * Delete. Neologism with zero Google hits. (I assume that number will increase slightly during this AfD period, as Google will eventually find this article and this AfD nomination.) Wikipedia is not a dictionary, especially not of words someone made up just now. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:26, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete As above, and I tagged it for deletion. how do you turn this on  03:30, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above.  Burner 0718  Jibba Jabba! 04:13, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per "A new term that hopefully will win support from the English speaking world" Townlake (talk) 04:29, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above: Looks like this was made up one day. Cliff smith  talk  16:04, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:MADEUP--as Townlake points out, the author basically admits within the article that this is something he just made up! --Smeazel (talk) 05:26, 21 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.