Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iframe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was    redirect to HTML element. Non-admin closure. Artw (talk) 23:43, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Iframe

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Page contains little content, only discussions as to past incorrectness alitheg (talk) 21:53, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I just read the article and I still don't know what it's about... not a good sign. Hairhorn (talk) 21:56, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * A1 No context. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 22:02, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * It used to be a redirect to HTML element and seems to be someone's attempt to expound on why iframes are different than frames. I think the HTML element article summarizes it sufficiently. Restore redirect. &mdash;Wrathchild (talk) 22:55, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep and redirect to HTML element, as it was previously. Page appears to have been vandalised. Artw (talk) 22:57, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Restore redirect to delete the commentary crap that was introduced in place of it. 70.29.208.129 (talk) 03:28, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect should be restored. -- Whpq (talk) 16:27, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.