Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iga A.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. seresin | wasn't he just...? 17:43, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Iga A.

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable per Notability (people) Gordonofcartoon (talk) 01:06, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't believe that the references cited are sufficient to establish notability.  Simply appearing in a magazine is not the same as having actual press coverage.  I once appeared in a picture on the front page of the Fort Worth Star-Telegram but that does not make me a notable person and would not even if I had a 34E bust. OlenWhitaker (talk) 02:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The Magazine cited as the source is a uk Lads Mag, Nuts. These magazines are notorious for making articles up, If they can't get hold of the models and a deadline is looming the they just write what they want. For the Americans amongst us this is almost as bad as somone saying "I read it in The Enquirer". The Website i cited as a source is the Official Iga Wyrwal website, currently under devolopment, My Source is Iga Wyrwal. This issue came about because i was in a rush for content, i used the original details on the wiki, I was immediately informed by Iga that the details were wrong. In short i basically said she was a year older, an inch shorter , An inch wider and a cup size smaller. Pretty much the the four things you should never say to a woman! She gave me the correct details , i edited the page and we've been going round in circles ever since. It was also note that She shot for the American Playboy not the UK one. The name issue is a strange one. The daily Star changed her name to Eva & eve without her consent , as they thought it would be easier to pronounce, this causes much confusion, For the record She prefers to be Iga or Iga A. Iga Wyrwal also known as Eva Wyrwal is acceptable, I can provide proof of the information & the validity of the source but i'm not prepared to do so on a public forum, i have included it wit the mail i sent DigitalWebDev (talk) 02:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article does not sufficiently establish notability per WP:BIO nor are there sufficient sources provided yet. If Iga A. becomes more famous in the future, the article can be re-created at that time, presumably by which time she will be referred to in the press by the same name consistently. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:54, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. It would take some study to figure out if Nuts magazine is a reliable source. Before going that far, it is easier just to observe that models fall under the 'performer' clause of WP:BIO. Actors, comedians, opinion makers, models, and television personalities:
 * With significant roles in notable films, television, stage performances, and other productions.
 * Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following.
 * Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment.


 * Clearly Iga A. has not passed that threshold yet. If she makes a noticeable impact an article might be considered later. EdJohnston (talk) 17:29, 9 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Does not meet WP:BIO. Ozgod (talk) 18:01, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet WP:BIO.--Fredrick day (talk) 19:32, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - NN-Bio - A l is o n  ❤ 21:59, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BIO. -- Jeandré, 2008-03-12t12:28z


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.