Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ignorant Art (Mixtape)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. While on numbers it is 2 each, the article bears no resemblence to the state it was in when it was nominated, and the nominator has withdrawn their nomination based on this. Davewild (talk) 20:47, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Ignorant Art (Mixtape)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NALBUMS. Not notable, no sources. Even if expanded to it's full potential, I still think it wouldn't be notable enough. Only notable part about the project is one of it's songs, Pu$$y, due to the controversy surrounding its video, but the song already has its own article. Would also support a redirect to Iggy Azalea.  Azealia 911  talk  20:25, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * WITHDRAWING NOMINATION PER ADDITION OF CONTENT FROM USERS.  Azealia 911  talk  15:19, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  00:15, 1 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Move to Iggy Azalea as my searches found no significant coverage for this album and it's not even listed at Allmusic. SwisterTwister   talk  17:41, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 2 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Iggy Azalea. There's no significant coverage for the mixtape itself, except for one of its notable songs. TBrandley (talk) 01:05, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Firstly, because of WP:BEFORE, section C2: "If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article." Further, the mixtape is discussed in two interviews here: and . This is the debut work of a notable artist and whilst the internet is awash with non-notable references to the EP, it would be a shame if Wikipedia were not the one trustworthy site that people could use. Also see  and |this.Dennisthemonkeychild (talk) 09:09, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Considerable time meaning how long? The creator uploaded the artwork, created an infobox, a minuscule lead and abandoned the article with an incomplete article tag. Other than that, there's been one IP editor making one edit, and myself giving the article a cleanup. How long do we wait before considering the article for deletion? If needs be, I'll withdraw and re-nom in a week or two, obviously only if it's still not improved.  Azealia 911  talk  10:44, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I will fix the page myself tomorrow. I have found plenty of info making the page notable. Dennisthemonkeychild (talk) 15:59, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * OK, the page is updated. I have kept the tags on there for now due to the AfD debate, but hope they can now all be removed.Dennisthemonkeychild (talk) 08:53, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

In that case, withdrawing my nomination, no idea how to officially do that, so I guess I'll just leave it open and wait for the closing editor to see this, I'll also remove the cleanup tags, and move the article "Ignorant Art (Mixtape)" → "Ignorant Art (mixtape)" thanks for your contribution to the article.  Azealia 911  talk  09:35, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, because and  have voted redirect, you wouldn't be able to withdraw it and expect it to be closed, though the procedure is to write your notion of withdrawal underneath your nominating comment.--  Laun  chba  ller  12:50, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah ok, have formally withdrawn at top of the page, hopefully and  can re-assess the page per these new additions and see if they still feel this way, thanks for the notice.  Azealia 911   talk  15:19, 4 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.