Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Igor Maslennikov (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:10, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Igor Maslennikov (disambiguation)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Declined CSD with bogus reason. Disambiguates only one page unnecessarily while having primary title. Now the primary title Igor Maslennikov already has hatnote pointing to the only other page. Disambiguation page for "two pages" is only done when there is no primary among them, and that means the base title must be the disambiguation page without the parenthetical qualifier. This is something of common sense and for which we have g14. But it seems the admin has his own policy different from the project policy on this. – Ammarpad (talk) 06:33, 21 December 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:41, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP policy denotes a hatnote is enough. Geschichte (talk) 09:03, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Clear delete Seems like basic common sense, even if it survived speedy deletion might have gone to prod. PatGallacher (talk) 15:41, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete but, so far as I can see, the page does not meet the WP:G14 criterion (see also Template:Db-g14) and so the speedy was correctly declined. Speedy criteria do not always say what we might think is sensible or what we would like them to say. I suspect, but only suspect, there is no policy against this page but only a guideline and that may be why it is not a speedy candidate. Thincat (talk) 17:52, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * It was not. The page disambiguates only one extant title. Existing primary title cannot be disambiguated. You cannot disambiguate something from itself. And both the policy and the template you link Template:Db-g14, mention that. It seems you too, you did not understand the policy yourself. – Ammarpad (talk) 18:25, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * It looks to me it is disambiguating two pages but I'll leave things there. See WT:Criteria for speedy deletion and WT:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 53. You may be able to help clear up some confusion. Thincat (talk) 18:43, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per obviousness. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:25, 22 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.