Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Igwe Kenneth Onyeneke Orizu III


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:32, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Igwe Kenneth Onyeneke Orizu III

 * – ( View AfD View log )

this article fails to establish notability - article fails WP:GNG & WP:RS. Amsaim (talk) 19:32, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, C T J F 8 3  17:01, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep For heaven's sake, he's the hereditary ruler of a city of 300,000 people in Nigeria. Of course he is notable - per WP:POLITICIAN if you aren't impressed that he is regarded as a Royal Highness. Google News finds plenty of material about him. --MelanieN (talk) 03:37, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Speedy Keep. GNG and RS were not meant to be used in this way to delete people with an obvious claim to notability.  Help find better sources, or claim that the article is making false claims, but please don't try to delete because the sources haven't been included yet.  –SJ +  18:14, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. As if Wikipedia were not biased enough.--TM 18:35, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.