Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ikenna Dieke


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 13:32, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Ikenna Dieke

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Can't find any sources that shows subject meets WP:NAUTHOR or WP:NPROF. No academic reviews found of "most notable book" --Neil N  talk to me 16:25, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per article's author. User:GodwinCollins is here solely to promote, they know these people aren't notable, and they're attempting to force notability with weird prose like the gibberish final sentence in this article.  City O f  Silver  16:47, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. L3X1  (distænt write)  17:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. L3X1  (distænt write)  17:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. L3X1  (distænt write)  17:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Not valid under A7 and I would contest a G11. L3X1 (distænt write)  17:31, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete This is just Professor but no reliable sources coverage to meet WP:ANYBIO and no academic achievement to pass WP:PROF. Also since the author is not heeding to warnings despite litany of deletion notices of his non notable BLPs, ANI may be necessary. –Ammarpad (talk) 17:46, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I did not think I would ever read "some of his essays have been published on wordpress". Seriously, that is not a sign of notability. Even an academic publishing multiple articles in peer reviewed journals is not in and of itself to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:21, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. His book did receive half a published book review . I'm sympathetic to Systemic bias but that's not enough for WP:AUTHOR or anything else. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:53, 27 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.