Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ikeoha I. Iwuh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No evidence of notability under WP:GNG or other relevant subject notability guidelines  j⚛e deckertalk 03:25, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Ikeoha I. Iwuh

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. Almost requested speedy deletion as a hoax as I could find nothing that indicates this person even exists. Note that the ISBNs for the two books don't work in any catalog or commercial source. Bbb23 (talk) 22:40, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 23:12, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 23:12, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 23:12, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 23:12, 27 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment "II Iwuh" scholar search returns one of the books. Acebulf (talk) 00:03, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Wouldn't have occurred to me to use that search term. That's the third book without the ISBN. What is "Magnet Business Publishing Coy"? And what is "Enugu"?--Bbb23 (talk) 00:17, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Enugu is the capital of Enugu State in Nigeria. I assume that's where Magnet Business Publishing is based. Qwfp (talk) 11:40, 28 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. I can find no evidence that this page meets WP:GNG, WP:ACADEMIC or WP:AUTHOR. The two references in the article are books by him, so are not independent sources. Qwfp (talk) 11:55, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I worry about systemic bias in cases like this but we really have nothing on which to base an article. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:54, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.