Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IkonoTV


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:44, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

IkonoTV
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Nonnotable business. No improvement since being tagged. Lembit Staan (talk) 22:57, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:28, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:28, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. Unambiguously promotional and only sourced to its website. enjoyer -- talk 02:29, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: See also the parallel AfDs on the related channels: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IkonoMenasa and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ikono_(art_democratization). AllyD (talk) 08:12, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
 * If one of these multiple articles is to survive, it should probably be with this title. However, the current article text is promotional and I am not seeing a previous quiet point version to which it could be reverted and improved, for example by incorporating the coverage referenced in the Ikono_(art_democratization) article, to facilitate consideration of whether notability can be demonstrated. AllyD (talk) 17:17, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I have now simplified this article and incorporated one reference. AllyD (talk) 09:25, 26 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete: The article from The National (Abu Dhabi) which I added as a reference is associated with their then-recent regional launch. From around the same time, there is a paywalled article by Alex Newman; while I can't see that, it contains the same sentences as this uncredited post which appears to be the same, and would indicate it to have been tied to their relaunch in central Europe and to be more about the founder's biography than the particular service.Some may regard these two items as sufficient for WP:NCORP but my view is that both are associated with describing the start-up proposition, and that more subsequent coverage is needed to demonstrate attained notability. Happy to revise my opinion on this particular article if such coverage can indeed be identified. AllyD (talk) 09:25, 26 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.