Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iku Nakahara


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:11, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Iku Nakahara

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Not enough evidence of notability. The sole claimed role is not verifiable even after incursion into the game website. One sole support role in a notable series doesn't constitute a voice actor career and thus can't pass WP:ENTERTAINER. In addition there is no Japanese Wikipedia article. Adding all those facts make me vote Delete. KrebMarkt 10:46, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.  --  Beloved  Freak  12:27, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 28 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Oh, not much doubt she voiced three popular viodeo games, but there is nothing to show this as itself notable. No articles. No awards.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:02, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Are those refs users editable database? If so that resolve nothing in term of verifiability unfortunately. --KrebMarkt 05:59, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Cast list is one of the more reliable (ahem) bits on IMDB which can be sourced to the production itself. However, and though I believe she was in those projects, I agree, there is no notability that is Wikipedia sourcable.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 04:04, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Yea, that the point mostly trustworthy source yet not enough to qualify as reliable by Wikipedia standard. Unfortunately any bad faith editor can hammer that kind of weak spot using the verifiability policy to practice scorched earth tactics. --KrebMarkt 08:52, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. No reliable sources or notability here. --DAJF (talk) 10:47, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.