Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Il Bisbetico Domato


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy Keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:05, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Il Bisbetico Domato

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable film with no independent reliable sources to support any claim of notability. Qwerty Binary (talk) 11:54, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 10 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Snow Keep per patent lack of WP:BEFORE, tons of book sources and multiple news sources, the film topped the box office of its year of release and, as per 1999, it was the sixth gross in Italian market history. Obviously notable. Cavarrone (talk) 18:07, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per flawed deletion rationale. What the nominator should understand that no article has to make an assertion of notability, nor does an article need to contain sources, as long as they are available. Notability is determined through sources available for a topic, and not whether or not the have been used within an article. See WP:NRVE. The article was less than one month old when nominated. So what? It does not have to be immediately perfect. I agree with User:Cavarrone.  It would have taken a lot less time to actually have done even minimal research, than it took to create this unneccessary AFD. Close this and let's move on.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:48, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * And by the way... I offer kudos to User:Cavarrone for showing just what due diligence at AFD is all about.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:13, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Noted; did research (learnt that the film is also known by the name The Taming of the Scoundrel and the first ten or so pages of a search with the film's name in Google yields a number of results from Amazon, YouTube, and other-than-kosher sites), as usual, but wasn't sure what to make of this. Thanks.
 * A search about any topic on "Google search" gives always dozens of pages of other-than-kosher sites. If you want to have a more satisfactory search you should have always to look at Google News, Google News archives, Google books and Google scholar. Or add to your search more specific key words such as "News" or "Review" (in this case "Notizie" or "Recensione"). Cavarrone (talk) 06:43, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Clearly, the film has a page on the Italian Wikipedia and there are references there. In any case, my bad. --Qwerty Binary (talk) 05:41, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * If you do a strike-through of your nom statement and add "Withdraw nomination", we can close this discussion.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:07, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per WP:NRVE. Topic notability is based upon the availability of significant coverage in reliable sources, rather than whether or not sources are present in articles. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:05, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.