Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ilaria Alpi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep - Richardcavell 23:46, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Ilaria Alpi
This page was deleted once under speedy deletion for insignifance (db-bio). Although there is more content now, has it reached "significant" yet? CPAScott 21:34, 3 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep. I wish I could translate faster from my mother language, but my skills in English allow me in few minutes to write only these two lines about an important (and somewhat controversial) journalist of our country. On the Italian article there isn't much more information, just where she studied, what languages she knew and a paragraph about the process following her and Miran Hrovatin's death. I saw the film about them (Ilaria Alpi - Il più crudele dei giorni, "Ilaria Alpi - the most cruel day") about two years ago and their story really fascinated me. I just can't explain it as I would like, but I think the information I wrote can be considered a stub. -- Daĉjo почта 21:40, 3 August 2006 (UTC)


 * In the future please consider developing pages within your User Pages (you can create as many subpages as you wish) until they are fully written and developed, and then publish them to the Wiki article space. This will prevent the articles from being tagged for deletion while you continue to add to them.  Best --CPAScott 21:44, 3 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Actually I didn't want to add anything to it, I just thought it could be a stub as I wrote it. ;) Will the tag be removed? (I don't know how the deletion procedure works here on en.wiki) -- Daĉjo почта 21:47, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * After a few days of merge discussion, the majority will rule. If the article is to remain (as it looks like it will) the tag will be removed then. CPAScott 23:19, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. An AfD is a debate, not a vote. Majority does not necessarily rule. The closing admin decides based on the strength of the arguments presented. Jokestress 02:32, 4 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep. Notable enough to be the subject of an IMDb-listed biopic. Jokestress 22:07, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. as per above. Biographies establish notability.  IMDB a big plus. NYcine 7:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.