Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ilke Schönbein


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 12:13, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Ilke Schönbein
Filling in an incomplete nomination by User:58.104.41.6 (steps 1 and 3, not 2). No reason for deletion provided in edit summary. Apparently a puppeteer with "a unique style" No vote at this time -- Saberwyn - The Zoids  Expansion Project 09:21, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, performer with no claim of notability. Lukas 11:14, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Don't think it's a speedy creates a powerful dynamic art form is a claim of notability. Her Le roi grenouille III (King Frog III)  was performed in Théâtre de la Commune, Aubervilliers.  She also performed Metamorphoses in the Magdeburg festival. That's not inconsiderable to find for a non-English puppeteer.  One may certainly question her overall notability though.    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  20:56, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable biography. Few Google hits (yes, I did search "Ilke Schönbein" with o-umlaut).  I don't know anything about Metamorphoses, can you expand on that?  If "creates powerful dynamic art" is a claim of notability, would "creates powerful dynamic Wikipedia articles" be one? :).  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-13 05:58Z 
 * Comment I agree the article seems fairly marginal from Google but that's not a great tool for a finding a non-English puppeteer - however it's all I can use. Metamorphoses is presumably based either on Ovid or maybe Kafka.  And yes, "creating powerful dynamic Wikipedia articles" be a valid claim of notability and much easier to verify too :-)  Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  18:02, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn Incognito 05:42, 18 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.