Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Illegal (Shakira)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus for deletion, but I'll try to merge this with Oral Fixation 2. Sjakkalle (Check!)  08:24, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Illegal (Shakira)
The song has not been released as a single, and therefore is non-notable. Should it be released as a single in the future, the article could be restored, but as per present day, it is an extra egg in the nest. &mdash;Hollow Wilerding. . . (talk) 22:54, 28 December 2005 (UTC) *reverted blanking by User:Rodrigogomespaixao Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 11:15, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Nominate and delete. &mdash;Hollow Wilerding . . . (talk) 22:56, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Thank goodness. Few nominators in today's busy AfD environment take the time to add a bullet point to explain that they're the nominator. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 12:32, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't know if I should feel complimented or insulted. ;) &mdash;Hollow Wilerding . . . (talk) 14:22, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Insulted, but with a smile :). fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 14:39, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * ... &mdash;Hollow Wilerding . . . (talk) 15:28, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Okay, the basic point (stripped of any attempt at humour) was that, with a well-written nomination, you don't need to (and shouldn't) make a "vote" on a separate line, let alone point out that you're the nominator. AfD is not supposed to be a vote, and doing this just increases the perception that it's all about the tally. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 15:33, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't usually vote in an AfD I've nominated, does that mean I am assumed to have voted delete anyway? - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 11:17, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Who cares? If you've written a good argument, that's as good as several no-reason-given votes. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 12:09, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Uh, sure. I think. &mdash;Hollow Wilerding . . . (talk) 16:51, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Oral Fixation 2 (parent article). Movementarian 00:46, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Doesn't warrant merge, IMO. -- Rune Welsh | &tau;&alpha;&lambda;&kappa; | Esperanza  03:45, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, recorded song by Shakira, why shouldn't wikipedia users be able to read about it? Failing that merge with album. Kappa 10:07, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with album, per precedent and because it makes obvious sense. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 12:11, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, if that fails then merge. Hey, HW! --DrippingInk 00:47, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Hello to you, DI. &mdash;Hollow Wilerding . . . (talk) 02:39, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep iff source is given for rumors. If not, merge -- article does have some actual information on the song.  --zenohockey 19:35, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable song as not released as a single yet. --Terence Ong Talk 03:45, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with album article. There's no reason to lose the information here just because the song doesn't warrant an entry. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 12:12, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 12:44, 3 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.