Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Illegal immigration to India


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow keep. Nominator blocked for WP:SOCKing. (non-admin closure) §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:37, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Illegal immigration to India

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Maximum sources from india, we can not reliable on India and Bangladesh source, we need third party sources to verify the actual fact It's true or not. The article seems lacks of neutrality and biased. We don't need comment from Bangladeshi and indian admin,previous afd of this article seems biased discussion which is archived now. Rasi56 (talk) 09:43, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:45, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:46, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:46, 17 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep notable topic. Neutrality, bias and unreliable sources are all editorial concerns that can be resolved without requiring the deletion of the article. SD0001 (talk) 10:33, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:Deletion is not cleanup: article not in such a state that WP:TNT is required.  OxonAlex    - talk  11:03, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
 * comment : not an editorial concern, Wikipedia always follow neutrality and verified sources . We can not reliable on india,Bangladesh or Pakistan statistics and news.Its unverified (per neutrality). We need third party statistics and sources otherwise it’s not necessary to keep this article just because of just notable topic. You can see the deletion archive many articles has been removed just  because of this verification concerns. “ notable topic. Neutrality, bias and unreliable sources are all editorial concerns that can be resolved ” its approve when just fews sentences, statistics are lacks of neutrality. You can not reliable on maximum indian sources. And there have less chance to fix this in future because 65 references was added. And this article looks like good so no one will bother in future about this article. So It's better to take decision now besides of nationalism not to be biased. You can see history related articles have many biased decisions and comments before which is we needed to avoid per as Wikipedia policy. We don't need to keep unverified articles for readers. Just base on Indian news we can not keep this,we need to international statistics and maximum coverage to stay this article on Wikipedia.       Rasi56 (talk) 11:25, 17 August 2019 (UTC)


 * 'Rename to a more neutral title.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:22, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep -- There certainly may be difficulties with article, but it relates to an important topic and should not be beyond rescue, if anything is wrong with it. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:11, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Peterkingiron (talk) --SalmanZ (talk) 21:16, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per SD0001 notable topic.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:39, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep the subject is a notable history and politics related topic. Keep per WP:GNG -- D Big X ray ᗙ  12:56, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note User:Rasi56 and Andy Kearns have been blocked at Sockpuppet investigations/Andy Kearns-- D Big X ray ᗙ  12:56, 18 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.