Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Illegal logging in the Philippines


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:28, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Illegal logging in the Philippines

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Page fork. UtherSRG (talk) 09:54, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  -- Danger 14:28, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions.  -- Danger 14:28, 8 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep The article is very poor, but the topic is an important one and noted as such in good sources. Borock (talk) 19:59, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I removed copyvio text. The article is now no more than a copy of Illegal logging with 3 references. It is easy to conceive that there might be a decent article entitled Illegal logging in the Philippines, but the only way to get there would be to start over. --Pontificalibus (talk) 21:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete and start over. Unlike Illegal logging in Madagascar, this article is rather vague and generic, with very little specific mention of the Philippines. There's little worth salvaging except possibly the references. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:18, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. I agree with the above comments except for that of the nominator. I will try and rustle up a Deforestation in the Philippines article and then this page should be redirected to it. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:51, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice to a proper article existing on the subject. MLA (talk) 23:13, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - Insufficient references provided with reliable sources for subject of article to meet WP:GNG. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 04:51, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.