Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Illiteration

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:00, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Illiteration
Delete. This is really splitting hairs; illiteration isn't even a word in the english language, according to several dictionaries (including Webster). Jackson 06:47, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, bastard love-child of a neologism and a misspelling of alliteration. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 07:14, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * Poor spelling, a stupid neologism, or both? We'll never know. Delete. DO'&#1048;eil 07:50, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even I know it's wrong, and my English is atrocious. El_C 11:54, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Possibly redirect to alliteration to discourage re-creation, and as a plausible misspelling. android&harr;talk 15:28, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Bad spelling or neologism. Jayjg (talk) 18:56, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Wipe bogus content and make it a redirect to alliteration (concur with Android79). Alternatively, the content could be put to use in the user manuals as a fine example of a NN neologism. --Smithfarm
 * Delete, non-notable neologism. -- Infrogmation 17:52, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete concur neologism Fawcett5 04:13, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.