Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Illuminati Day


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. NW ( Talk ) 04:19, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Illuminati Day

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

no indication of notability. Does not warrant its own article - maybe mention on the main Illuminati page. noq (talk) 07:47, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Bad case of hangeritis, almost to the point of being nonsense.  Sounds like some kid built a wikipedia page after hearing all about the Illuminati.  I won't even suggest a merge. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 08:14, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Total agreement with noq. Pdcook (talk) 14:01, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete with all due respect grovelingly accorded to the Illuminati.--Milowent (talk) 15:01, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you, your appropriate grovelling has been noted and you shall be rewarded in the New World Order...; coming any day now FlowerpotmaN &middot;( t ) 16:17, 12 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete But seriously, the article is a case of WP:MADEUP of course, although I like the idea of trying out the New World Order for a day, just to see how it goes. FlowerpotmaN &middot;( t ) 16:17, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: as per Flowerpotman. Article creator Bows112 (contribs) is a SPA for this article. Grey Wyvern ⚒  17:50, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as G3 Pure vandalism and blatant hoaxes if possible. 169.226.85.157 (talk) 16:44, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.