Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ilona Yusuf


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Courcelles 00:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Ilona Yusuf

 * – ( View AfD View log )

One book of poems and various other activities don't add up to notability IMO. Nothing in this bio suggests otherwise. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:08, 29 December 2010 (UTC) Clarityfiend (talk) 23:08, 29 December 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:50, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete. GNews serch suggests she is getting some attention from media in Pakistan, but I didn't find any articles directly about her or her work. Should someone find articles that cover her in detail, that would make a difference. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 11:46, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  --  Beloved  Freak  12:05, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of notability. Qworty (talk) 22:47, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - She apparently is an artist who works in multiple mediums. The article refers to a review of her book of poetry.  The article is no longer online but there's no reason to doubt its existence.  Her exhibition of art was covered three times by the same paper close together for some reason:, , , and there is some minor mentions like this.  Not a lot, but enough for me to say it puts it over the notability bar. -- Whpq (talk) 17:57, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Since the links provided by Whpq do prove some notability, there really shouldn't be a solid reason for deleting the article. Mar4d (talk) 04:07, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.