Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Im Gespräch mit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. SarahStierch (talk) 18:11, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Im Gespräch mit

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A talk show hosted by Michel von Tell. The show also goes by Im Gespräch mit von Tell (translated as A conversation with von Tell) No reliable refs to be found. There are plenty of social media links, including YouTube. Von Tell's article also is up for AfD at: Articles for deletion/Michel von Tell‎. Bgwhite (talk) 05:22, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bgwhite (talk) 05:24, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:PORNBIO says " Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following." another point witch is in the entertainer criteria" Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions". talked in his show to a lot of outstanding unique people about profific topics. like i sayed. for me rel is absolutly given. absolutly enogh for a small article.Jimkio12 (talk) 06:38, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep hybercritic -  i found videos on you tube with about a million viewsa - huge fan base - decumentary movies - imdb listing - amount of very popular guests and so on. wikipedia says :
 * First off, see WP:NPA - calling Bgwhite a "hypercritic" is a personal attack. In addition, YT cannot be used as a reliable source, and nor can IMDB or any of the social media links. Please read WP:RS to see which sources may be considered reliable. It cannot pass WP:PORNBIO with such claims alone, without any reliable sources to back them. hmssolent \You rang? ship's log 06:50, 4 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete: no reliable sources to establish notability. In addition to that the editing pattern, with User:Jimkio12 being the only contributor, makes me believe there's a COI involved, and that the article is used for self-promotion. Thomas.W (talk) 09:48, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete more Jimkio12 spam. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:13, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Most of the links I've found on Google are largely video repositories; and the Spiegel articles do not appear to be reliable enough - also per Thomas.W. hmssolent \You rang? ship's log 00:43, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete As per above. I stumbled on this while NAPing another one of the author's articles in which I am leaning towards AfD. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ad Orientem (talk • contribs) 03:06, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. I request that the closing admin disregard the references to WP:PORNBIO above. This article does not appear to have anything to do with pornography. For that matter, it's not even a biography. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:28, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.