Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ImageShack


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Punkmorten 21:36, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

ImageShack
Neatly written, but doesn't merit an article about it. Tyrenius 16:15, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Nom withdrawn. Sorry - I made a mistake in googling the name. (Embarrassment) Tyrenius 16:59, 21 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep. Why do you think it doesn't merit an article?  According to Alexa, over 8,000 pages link to it.  That's not utterly insignificant.  Pastafarian Nights 16:35, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep As much traffic as photobucket, used in many high traffic communities, established site at 2.5 years service. If someone has an issue with this, why don't they come out and say it rather than making up garbage and obviously false reasons for deletion. --Crossmr 16:53, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep and close this AfD Googling "ImageShack" (in quotes) gets 15.8 MILLION hits. Alexa ranks imageshack.us at 93 . NINETY-THREE! And that's not even in the US- that's worldwide. If this article goes, then the article on every single web site, including Wikipedia, should go. -- Kicking222 16:53, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I find it interesting that deletion is being pushed by people who have obviously been here awhile and should have the common sense to see that this is a notable site. --Crossmr 16:56, 21 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment The wrong google To err is human... AGF Tyrenius 17:15, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Neither keep nor delete, I instead vote for all of Wikipedia's multitudinous contributors to point at Tyrenius and giggle. Vizjim 18:24, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, your idea made me giggle. :-) Tyrenius 19:13, 21 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.